User Online: 4 | Timeout: 08:59Uhr ⟳ | email | BNE OS e.V.  | Info | Portal Klimabildung  | Auswahl | Logout | AAA  Mobil →
BNELIT - Datenbank zu Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung: wissenschaftliche Literatur und Materialien
Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung: wiss. Literatur und Materialien (BNELIT)
Datensätze des Ergebnisses:
Suche: Auswahl zeigen
Treffer:1
Sortierungen
1. Aufsatz in Zeitschrift
(Korrektur)Anmerkung zu einem Objekt von BNE-LITERATUR per email Dieses Objekt in Ihre Merkliste aufnehmen (Cookies erlauben!) in den Download Korb (max. 50)!
Verfasser/-in:
 
 
 
Hauptsachtitel:
Comparing Sustainable Universities between the United States and China.
Untertitel/Zusätze:
Cases of Indiana University and Tsinghua University.
Zeitschriftenausgabe (-> Ref.Nr):
Zeitschrift/Zeitung:
Sustainability
Z-Jahrgang:
7
Z-Heftnummer/-bez.:
9
Erscheinungsjahr:
Seite (von-bis):
11799-11817
Kurzinfo:
Abstract:
It is widely accepted that universities can play critical roles in promoting sustainability. In the United States and China, many universities have initiated sustainability programs. Employing Indiana University, Bloomington, the U.S. (IUB) and Tsinghua University, Beijing, China (Tsinghua) as two cases, we examine the conceptualization and implementation of university sustainability programs through a comparison of their respective definitions, goals, organizational dynamics, and strategies. We find that IUB′s sustainability scheme is more detailed and specific, while Tsinghua′s is more general; this is principally attributable to differences in national and local contexts. Furthermore, IUB values the environmental, economic, and social aspects of university sustainability equally, while Tsinghua focuses more on the environmental aspect. In addition, IUB has a more loosely-structured and more inclusive sustainability organizational dynamic while Tsinghua has a more hierarchical one. This comparative study helps us to understand how these two research universities understand and implement sustainability within the respective cultural, political, and institutional contexts of the United States and China.
Original-Quelle (URL):
DOI:
10.3390/su70911799
Datum des Zugriffs:
22.04.2016