Tab of contents Title Declaration Acknowledgement Abstract Key words Chapter 1: Orientation1.1 Introduction
1.2 Heritage sites as EE resources
1.3 Reflection on the incorporation of environmental education at different levels
1.3.1 International level
1.3.2 National level
1.4 Problem description
1.4.1 Problem statement
1.4.2 Hypothesis
1.5 Research question
1.6 Purpose of the study
1.7 Motivation for the research
1.8 Research approach, method and design
1.8.1 Data collection methods, analysis and interpretation
1.8.1 (a) Observations
1.8.1 (b) Document analysis
1.8.1 (c) Interveiws
1.8.1 (d) Focus group interviews
1.8.1 (e) Questionnaires
1.8.1 (f) Sampling
1.8.1 (g) Data analysis
1.8.1 (h) Interpretation of data
1.8.1 (i) Ethical concerns
1.9 Summary
Chapter 2: Conceptualization and Contextualization of World Heritage sites as environmental education resources2.1 Introduction
2.1.1 The Greater St. Lucia Wetland Park
2.1.2 The Robben Island
2.1.3 Mapungubwe
2.1.4 uKhahlamba Drakensberg Park
2.1.5 The Cape Flora Region World Heritage Site
2.1.6 The Cradle of Humankind
2.1.6 (a) Sterkfontein site
2.1.6 (b) Taung site
2.1.6 (c) Makapan′s Valley
2.1.6 (d) Kromdraai
2.1.6 (e) Drimolen
2.1.6 (f) Bolt′s farm, Wonder cave, Minnaar′s Caves, Plover′s Lake, Haasgat, Gondolin, and Coopers Caves.
2.1.6 (g) Gladysvale
2.1.6 (h) Swartkrans
2.2 Definitions
2.2.1 Heritage
2.2.2 Site
2.2.3 Heritage site
2.2.4 World heritage sites
2.2.5 Environment
2.2.6 Education
2.2.7 Environmental Education
2.2.8 Environmental education resources
2.3 Environmental Educatin programmes at the heritage sites, heritage issues and the curriculum, and heritage educators
2.3.1 Heritage sites and environmental education programmes
2.3.2 Heritage issues and the curriculum
2.3.3 Heritage educators
2.3.4 Resources at the Cradle of Humankind
2.3.4 (a) Teacher′s resource pack
2.3.4 (a) (i) Learner′s activities
2.3.4 (a) (ii) The sustainability wall
2.4 Summary
Chapter 3: Research approach, method, design and data collection tools3.1 Introduction
3.2 Research approach
3.3 Research method
3.4 Ensuring research accuracy
3.5 Research process: Design and methodological strategies
3.5.1 Research design
3.5.2 Data collection tools
3.5.2 (a) Observation
3.5.2 (b) Document analysis
3.5.2 (c) Interviews
3.5.2.(d) Questionnaire
3.6 Data analysis
3.7 Summary
CHAPTER 4: Presentation, analysis, and interpretation of data4.1 Introduction
4.2 Data from observation and findings
4.2.1 Observation at Maropeng
4.2.2 Observation at Sterkfontein
4.3 Data from documents and their results
4.3.1 The teacher′s resource pack
4.3.2 Maropeng educational resource pack
4.3.3 The sustainability wall
4.3.3 (a) The four main elements
4.3.3 (b) Dumping of rubbish
4.3.4 Telephones
4.4 Data obtained from interviews and the results
4.4.1 Biographical data of participants
4.4.2 Data on Environmental Education policies obtained at the site
4.4.3 Data on heritage educators at the site and their response
4.4.4 Data on teaching environmental activities at the site and the findings
4.4.5 Data on heritage issues, environmental activities, the curriculum and the findings
4.4.6 Data on resources for teaching environmental activities at the site and their findings
4.4.6 (a) Projects: The pom-pom weed (Campuloclinium macrocephalum)
4.4.6 (b) Indigenous plant/grasses
4.4.6 (c) Partnerships- UNESCO
4.4.6 (d) Pollution
4.4.6 (e) Recycling
4.4.7 Data on educators who visited the site and the results
4.4.7.a Fauna
4.4.7.b.Flora
4.4.7.c.National Geographic programme on DSTV
4.5 Summary
CHAPTER 5: RESEARCH SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS5.1 Introduction
5.2. Summary of research findings
5.2 1 Observations at Maropeng
5.2.2 Observations at Sterkfontein
5.2.3 Document results
5.2.3 (a) The teacher′s resource pack
5.2.3 (b) Maropeng educational resource pack
5.2.3 (c) The sustainability wall
5.3 Recordings available via telephones
5.4 RESULTS FROM INTERVIEWS
5.4.1 Biographical data
5.4.2 Data on Environmental Education policies at the site
5.4.3 Data on heritage educators at the site
5.4.4 Data on how to teach environmental activities at the site
5.4.5 Data on heritage, environmental activities and the curriculum
5.4.6 Data on resources for teaching environmental activities at the site
5.4.7 Data on educators who visited the site
5.4.8 Testing the hypothesis
5.5 Recommendations
5.6 Limitations of the study
5.7 Suggestions for further research
5.8 Summary
6. BIBLIOGRAPHY 7. APPENDICES APPENDICE A QUESTIONNAIRE
APPENDICE B LETTER TO THE CRADLE OF HUMANKIND REQUESTING PERMISSION TO DO RESEARC
APPENDICE C LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE CRADLE OF HUMANKIND PARTICULARLY MAROPENG AND STERKFONTEIN SITES
APPENDICE D ATTENDANCE REGISTER FOR DISTRICT 14 TEACHERS WHO VISITED MAROPENG